I was always a defender of ‘climate change’, but my defence wasn’t because of “what the science is telling us”,
The climate is changing >
Part of this has to do with human activity - it has to do with our species misuse of the Earth, it’s resources, and it has to do with humanities exploitation of other species and the environment,
The rest has to do with solar and geocosmic events which are outside of human control;
David Wilcock described galatic, solar, climatic and evolutionary changes relating to DNA, consciounsss and accelerated planetary transformation after the year 2012, here ( > )
Something is happening - something way beyond anthropo-hubris.
People who say “trust the science” usually aren’t scientists, and neither am I - but I do know that scientists often disagree, I know that various datasets get totally sidelined and ignored, that entire areas of research are persistently shunned and ridiculed by the scientific mainstream. I know that attention and funding and research is dependent on institutions, governments, corporations, on ideology, and upon the influence of private actors who have a vested interest in seeing specific outcomes.
For example: In evolutionary theory traditional Darwinian evolution is based on Phyletic Gradualism. This model still dominates the popular mindset in regards to how speciation occurs - Phyletic Gradualism supports the idea that things evolve slowly and gradually over long periods of time by anagenesis; meaning that a species gradually adapts to its environment through selection pressures until the morphology eventually drifts into a new type, or subspecies.
This is how most people, including many scientists still think evolution occurs. Never mind the fact that this isn’t actually what happens 99.9% of the time.
What really happens, except in some rare cases where gradualism does occur; is that things don’t actually evolve. They stay in stasis for millions of years - most species preserve their morphology until some kind of geological event takes place and then you have cladogenesis; an explosion of new species, which happens abruptly - this is called a Punctuated Equilibrium, it’s a rapid evolutionary event. This is evident in the fossil record and it’s the reason why every geological epoch has its own unique set of species.
Sudden climatic events cause accelerated speciation -
Most scientists simply ignored Punctuated Equilibrium because they assumed that there was nothing interesting about the long periods of stasis that most species undergo throughout their lifetime (about 4 million years on average, but in some cases much much longer - as is the case with living fossils) and instead focused on the rare cases of gradualism. Why did they do this? It is becuase of their biases against anything which may appear as creation - a scary word for the modern, profaned Cathedral of the scientific establishment and institutional mainstream - it doesn’t sit well with Darwin’s models of evolution by natural selection becuase it sounds more like creationism!
So just ignore it, shall we?
It’s not even ‘creationism’ anyway - it’s a different model of evolution based on long periods of stasis and short (geologically speaking) periods of punctuation leading to rapid change. Darwinian Gradualism is Fake News! - Yet it appears as monolithic as his models continue to dominate and colour the thinking of popular scientists such as Richard Dawkins.
Do you get it? Scientists themselves don’t always follow the data and are certainly not immune to ideology and political bias - they follow the money, the politics, the orthodoxy, the community consensus reality and the status quo.
And then the media follows the orthodoxy and the heterodox scientists get ignored.
And the masses follow the media, which tells them to “trust the science”.
It can be hard for some people to understand that the new Church is the institutional, scientific, academic and media systems which practice tight gatekeeping and narrative control; effectively bullying people down certain avenues which serve their agenda whilst vilifying heretics - even if they are right.
“And yet it moves” Galileo said, as they refused to look through his telescope - or in the case of stasis; it doesn’t.
How many people consider the possibility that we could have entirely new kinds of sacred science rather than the profane science that is supported and perpetuated by the establishment?
It’s something to seriously think about.
So, my main reason for defending human-induced climate change was not because of what the science is telling us, as unlike Punctuated Equilibrium; which clearly presents itself as evident in the fossil record - the data and circumstances are much more complex and uncertain when it comes to the the Earth’s climatic conditions.
My reason for defending it then, was anecdotal - I assumed that since there is so much deforestation occurring around the planet, coupled with all of the carbon and methane emissions released into the atmosphere from human technologies and activities; that this would likely affect the climate and warm it up.
I still think this could be the case, but some data appears to show that carbon dioxide and even methane emmsions from human activity are doing very little to warm the planet - so I remain sceptical.
The climate is changing and we are certainly ravaging our planet of its natural resources and destroying much of its biodiversity -
Yet I think that the true picture is much more complex, and it’s about time we start waking up to this. I guess, I’m wondering if there is a Climate Agenda, or if there are other factors involved -
This of course is instant heresy, and it automatically makes me a right-wing conspiracy theorist !
Today we are constantly gaslighted and guilt-tripped by the dominant institutional systems as they attempt to make us feel like it’s our fault; or that we should do something about the situation, that we should be the ones who put pressure on corporations and governments to change their ways - enter Greta Thunberg, Extiction Rebellion, and the motivations of the Globalists !
Imagine this scenario by thinking about that old PC game from the mid-90s called Theme Park - which was a construction and management simulation. Imagine filling your Theme Park full of exciting rollercoasters🎢 which release large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, use lots of Rare Earth Metals and conribute to biome collapse -
just imagine that these ones do, for the purpose of the thought experiment, whilst not forgetting that natural events such as volcanoes 🌋 also release huge amounts of C02, and that forests actually absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere - meaning that if these can be protected, carbon dioxide isn’t really the issue !
And let’s say you fill your park with loads of really good burger 🍔 bars, you let in your customers and the rollercoasters and burgers are a hit,
I wonder why? Maybe it’s because rollercoasters are fun and burgers taste great!
Then imagine trying to convince the people inside your theme park not to eat the burgers or go on the rides anymore by making them feel guilty for doing so, and by promoting some kind of fake, second-rate alternatives !
Some of them decide to be ‘ethical’ and resist the rides and burgers, but the Theme Park remains and most continue to enjoy what it has to offer.
What do you do? Well imagine you have made enough money by this stage from all of the rides and burgers to develop new technologies and a new system where you don’t need the theme parks or the consumers inside them anymore — you can create something much better for yourself in the near future…
The only problem is you have all of this surplus of stock and people that you don’t know what to do with, they are causing a problem now and you want to get rid of them - you need to convince them that the Theme Park cannot keep its operations going anymore and that lifestyles need to dramatically change,
it isn’t going to be easy.
The Theme Park is real - it’s our world system, it’s post-industrial global capitalism; which is coming to an end and is currently being replaced by something else.
You need to dramatically reduce the world population - to about half a billion (according to the Georgia Guidestones, philosopher John Grey, Bill Gates and most other globalists and futurists)
- Essentially you need collapse to happen so you can create your New World System, thus safeguarding the biosphere for your own selfish interests and getting rid of the majority of your visitors, who are now growing older, fatter, stupider, and increasingly domesticated, having developed a plathora or degenerative and inflammatory diseases, and have become increasingly useless, as a result of the conditions created by the theme park, that you built !
You need to kill off the old system and most of everyone else with it.
How do you do it?
In many ways you don’t need to do a lot, “the future will take care of itself” as Nick Land put it. Modernism is a curious thing, just look at the graph for population growth since 10,000 BCE - it’s a vertical cliff.
But the exponential growth in world population is set to plummet and there are many reasons for this.
One reason is urbanisation and education; it is expected that modern urbanisation will continue to spread around the planet and this is correlated with population decline - traditional societies create stable populations, but modernism is not the norm.
It is your God-given right to have children, but modernism wants you to feel bad about that too; movements like anti-natalism perpetuate the idea that you should feel guilty about having children, going so far as to try to persuade you not to have them at all, yet in countries all over the world where urbanism and modernism are spreading, including places like India - the population is set to drop below replacements levels as people move off the land and into mega cities.
It only takes one generation to not have enough children and the population can no longer sustain itself.
Globalism is set to spread around the world, this alone is enough to cause a population cataclysm.
Another reason is pollution - Everyone’s favourite ‘crackpot’ Alex Jones was warning people for years about petrochemicals, hormones and other pollutants which were “turning the frogs gay” - people laughed at him for that but the reality is that he was making a point about how environmental pollutants impact life systems. It is now confirmed that pollutants are causing mass infertility in men, and that males are being born with smaller penises. It’s expected that most couples will not be able to conceive naturally by the mid-2040s.
A common reaction to this information is cognitive dissonance and a defensive display that tries to side with the globalist mindset. Something like “well isn’t that a good thing as there are too many people anyway?” - but there aren’t too many people, it’s the consumption of resources in developed countries which causes a problem - and it’s the attractions created inside the Theme Park!
And however much you protest as part of Extinction Rebellion or try to reduce your carbon footprint; the reality is that elites already have plans in place to deal with the situation, which they have known about for a long time.
It doesn’t matter what you do; do what you like!, it’s your choice - exercise your freedom and work from your own conscious inner morality and guide your own decisions.
A brilliant analogy is Ronald Emerich’s film 2012; the Arc’s are created for the multi-billionaires, who will survive and cross-over into the new world and everyone else gets left behind to die out.
This is the central question for the elites; and let’s not forget The Great Reset! - or is that also a ‘conspiracy theory’?!!
“what do you do with all of the people who get left behind?”
You have to get them thinking in the right way so that their thinking aligns with your agenda, so they don’t cause chaos and revolt (God forbid)
Super strong AI, big data and control of the media narrative is already proving more than useful here!
It just so happens that rejection of traditional values, destruction of the family, propensities for transhumanism and post-humanism, social stratification which replaces face to face interaction with human to machine interaction (ZOOM!), social distancing for “disease prevention” (how convenient), promotion of vegetarianism and veganism, global-thinking over nationalistic and tribal thinking, promotion of queer and trans identity -
( I’m not saying that there is anything wrong with this, at all! I’m saying that these identities, orientations and ideologies are weaponised and exploited by elites to promote their self serving depopulation agenda )
destruction of religion and spirituality replaced with subservience to the state... basically; Communism, totalitarianism, New World Order, feminisation and loss of national identity is a suitable model for population control, and people wonder why a consequence of that is right-wing push back and NeoReaction -
It’s all very convenient when you have a surplus of people that you don’t know what to do with, that you’d rather do away with, and who are going to be left behind and will die out anyway (Yuval Noah Harari’s “Global Useless Class”).
There is nothing wrong with any of these things in the abstract - there is nothing wrong with caring about the environment (I do, you should) choosing to be vegan (I used to be), there is nothing wrong with being trans (I’m trans myself! - joke ;)
Im really a white dude!
But gender is fluid and performative — especially online :)!)
Late-Stage Civilisation and cybernetics is distorting our self image and mutating our identities !
That’s a consequence of technological conditions, being queer is the new normal,
I’m two-spirit -
there is nothing wrong with choosing not to have children, and there is nothing wrong with rejecting tradition and gender norms, and living in different ways (I do that).
Yes, I support the right for individuals to practice all of these things in a free and liberal society, and I vehemently condemn bigotry directed against those who choose these lifestyles.
But the outright rejection of traditional values and norms is part of an agenda that serves a system that no longer has any use for its surplus stock of humans. It’s making us sick and obsolete, and it’s a convenient way to keep us subservient and docile whilst elites create their New World Reality,
which is for them, it’s not for us.
This is, in a nutshell, the sole reason why there has been so much reaction and pushback in recent years - it’s a symptom.
It’s a bottleneck, it’s The Great Filter...
As I described, it’s bigger than anything humans could cause or create on their own, it’s a Punctuated Equilibrium - or better defined as Punctuational Change.
On the Galatic Scale
This is how the climate question ties in with evolution and the future of humanity, or post-humanity.
So I am not exactly denying climate change, climate change is very real, it’s happening, it’s getting warmer. I am questioning the dominant narrative and the way it is being sold to us.
We all need to start questioning that narrative and, we must begin standing up for ourselves and focus on defending our humanity!
As I mentioned at the beginning of this text, although I am not a scientist, I do not believe that there is enough evidence that climate change is purely down to human actions alone.
The Earth has gone through various interglacial periods where it has warmed before - even going into ‘Hothouse’ stages where carbon dioxide built up and caused runaway climatic change; the Earth survived, evolution punctuated and new species arose; hence here you are today reading this text, a robot, or are you a human? Or something else!?
It is evident in our geological record that climate change is the norm for our planet - it has gone through multiple ice ages, extinction events and various warmings in its long and dramatic history. It is interesting to consider why - Are these down to cyclical galactic changes and cosmic events as David Wilcock proposes?
Our planet isn’t a closed system, it’s part of the wider cosmos, and things that happen in the cosmos affect our planet.
Could something like Interplanetary Climate Change be happening now?
What about the Sun? Is the Sun changing? -
What is the role of climate change as part of wider evolutionary acceleration, sudden genetic drift, shifts in world consciousness and abrupt planetary transformation?
Maybe it’s all interlinked, this is why I will not be guilt-tripped and gaslighted into feeling bad that human actions alone have caused this, reject the natural inclinations of my species, or do anything that I am told to do by the propaganda machine and the agenda coming from above.
Read; the influence of elities and their alignment with the goals of AI and ET…
Scientists have been warning us that this one could be really bad. OK, so what’s the worst-case scenario? We, or is it they ? - Destroy our biosphere and our planet ends up like Mars?... It’s not likely to happen, but it could happen, it might do. If it does, what do we need to do?
Speciate, bifurcate, punctuate - move towards a Type-1 Civilisation that can control the weather, expand space travel and use AI and automation to make other planets like Mars habitable (there are already plans for the development of a City on Mars set to begin by the 2050s) - you’ll also need to use synthetic biology and biotechnology to genetically alter human beings so that they can survive the changes coming to this planet, interstellar space travel and survive on other planets.
All of this is in the works.
Which is why we need to be careful that our sacred genetics, spirituality, individuality, traditions and the unique characteristics of our species don’t get fucked over in the process!
By the motivations of non-humans, post-humans, atheists and transhumanists.
I am well aware that a Biosingularity is inevitable, but it isn’t the only way to survive this,
Despite what they say.
For those of us who value the preservation of our species, our traditions and our spirituality on Earth -
We reject the Alien World Order and its exploitation of Earth’s Biodiversity.
In the past Reza Negrestani has written of the tyranny of the sun 🌞 - proposing submission and subservience to an artificial alternative.
I propose that this is reductive, promethean and hubristic - however ‘technologically advanced’ it may appear on the surface.
Negrestani considers The Sun; personified as the father, tyrannical inasmuch as we have been completely dependent on it throughout our evolutionary history, until now
(note that it is actually humanism, or post-humanism that in-fact rejects the Sun, becuase it rejects God - )
For this reason alone, both humanism and inhumanism are more alike each other than they would like to admit, because of their shared indifference to the divine and mysterious power of a universal creator spirit.
However, the hubristic, adolescent tantrum of humanities rejection of the personified Solar Father, and the consequent submission to technological means of species transcendence leads to spiritual and biological reduction (SETHIX) - as I show in other writings.
How do we combat this - a Dark Sun ?! Perhaps ... Or maybe we are just coming of age - into The New Sun, The New Earth
and The New Dawn,
is already upon us.
How might we protect the light of consciousness 🌟!!?
Tread careful 🪐 🔥